Check out the repost of a nice Andrew Gelman piece on the perils of the "single definitive study". I'm not entirely sure what he means by "happy talk", but it's very apt as a description of the sort of academic gushing that seems to be required by the "impact agenda". Nothing against publicity, BTW, but perhaps one should have something worth saying first. Anyway, a good excuse to listen to REM.
The robustness reproducibility of the American Economic Review
-
We estimate the robustness reproducibility of key results from 17
non-experimental AER papers published in 2013 (8 papers) and 2022/23 (9
papers). We the...
7 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment