Check out the repost of a nice Andrew Gelman piece on the perils of the "single definitive study". I'm not entirely sure what he means by "happy talk", but it's very apt as a description of the sort of academic gushing that seems to be required by the "impact agenda". Nothing against publicity, BTW, but perhaps one should have something worth saying first. Anyway, a good excuse to listen to REM.
Posts
Solving for the equilibrium?
-
Sixteen AI agents were each handed 1,000 satoshis of real bitcoin and
told nothing about how to use it. A hundred rounds later, four of them
had ...
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment