Popular Posts

  • Open letter to Prof. Richard Wilkinson & Prof. Kate Pickett
    Dear Professors Wilkinson and Pickett You don't know me and are unlikely to read this letter. Even if you do, I know  you won't r...
  • Is sociology useless?
    Something I've been meaning to blog about for a while. The Guardian 's Aditya Chakrabortty has been putting the boot into  sociolog...
  • Bauman, plagiarism, blah, blah
    Another week, another plagiarism scandal. THE is reporting that one of Britain's favourite blah blah sociologists Zygmunt Bauman has...
  • Life is stranger than art
    It's funny how occasionally you come across little snippets of information that momentarily knock your otherwise stable image of the wo...
  • That old black magic: on Bourdieu again
    When I was an undergraduate Bourdieu didn't make the syllabus. There was plenty of verbiage from Continental Europe - Althusser, Poulan...
  • Of beads and bad eggs
    The Glass Bead Game is one of the books I bought at the end of my first year at university. The long hot Summer stretched ahead, I read the...
  • What have you been reading?
    Kieran Healey has produced a fascinating graphic of the number of citations of the 10 most cited sociology journal articles in each decade...
  • Happy shiny people
    This article in the Guardian about the cult of measuring "happiness"   reminded me of something that Karl Popper wrote in 1948: ...
  • On metaphors - cultural and social capital again
    Recently, as you no doubt know,  I've been beating up on the use of the term "capital" in phrases like "cultural capital...
  • David Byrne on Mills on Byrne on quantitative methods
    I believe in genuinely open discussion, so when David Byrne contacted me about my post on  his Sociology article on quantitative methods ...

Caveat Emptor

The opinions expressed on this page are mine alone. Any similarities to the views of my employer are completely coincidental.

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Happy Talk

Check out the repost of a nice Andrew Gelman piece on the perils of the "single definitive study". I'm not entirely sure what he means by "happy talk", but it's very apt as a description of the sort of academic gushing  that seems to be required by the "impact agenda". Nothing against publicity, BTW, but perhaps one should have something worth saying first. Anyway, a good excuse to listen to REM.
Posted by Colin at 02:08

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)