Popular Posts

  • Is sociology useless?
    Something I've been meaning to blog about for a while. The Guardian 's Aditya Chakrabortty has been putting the boot into  sociolog...
  • Open letter to Prof. Richard Wilkinson & Prof. Kate Pickett
    Dear Professors Wilkinson and Pickett You don't know me and are unlikely to read this letter. Even if you do, I know  you won't r...
  • The Great British Class Fiasco
    It's been a bad week for my blood pressure. I'm trying manfully to ignore the hooplah arising from MT shuffling off her mortal coil...
  • Musical consumption again
    Desert Island Discs is, I suppose, one of the great guilty pleasures of the British middle-classes. We know  the format is contrived and th...
  • Is there an anti-quantitative bias in British sociology?
    My title is inspired by a book chapter written more than 30 years ago by my former colleague Christopher T. Husbands  called: The anti-quan...
  • How sociologists make themselves absurd
    I'm struggling to articulate a half-formed thought in this post so you may prefer to skip it and wait  until I manage to state it more ...
  • Music, Culture and Distinction
    As you can probably guess I've been spending time  reading the literature on cultural consumption. It's entirely possible that I ha...
  • Into the mystic - Bourdieu and MCA
    What is it with Bourdieusians and multiple correspondence analysis? Why do they place  so much faith in one modest little data reduction to...
  • Talking of which...
    As a follow up to my last post, here is a piece by Declan Gaffney in the Staggers satirizing the low standards of intellectual integrity t...
  • Chakrabortty on Economics
    Aditya Chakrabortty  has another of his ill-informed rants about academic economics in today's Guardian . I don't need to defend e...

Caveat Emptor

The opinions expressed on this page are mine alone. Any similarities to the views of my employer are completely coincidental.

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Happy Talk

Check out the repost of a nice Andrew Gelman piece on the perils of the "single definitive study". I'm not entirely sure what he means by "happy talk", but it's very apt as a description of the sort of academic gushing  that seems to be required by the "impact agenda". Nothing against publicity, BTW, but perhaps one should have something worth saying first. Anyway, a good excuse to listen to REM.
Posted by Colin at 02:08

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)