Popular Posts

  • Quantophobia is back in town
    Good manners prevents me from saying much of what I really think about this piece by Robert Dingwall: Quantophrenia is Back in Town . Dis...
  • The liberal London tribe: Parsons or Merton?
    It will take me a little time  to decode the implications of  David Goodhart's latest piece in the FT.  I think he has just declared w...
  • That leaves so much out...
    This is the first in what I hope will grow into a series of posts on rhetorical strategies commonly used by sociologists to avoid acknowled...
  • What is a university?
    The Guardian today gives space in its education section to what is, in effect, an advertisement for BPP University College masquerading as ...
  • 100 years ago
    Walking to and from work over the past few weeks has been a sobering experience. Many of the houses in our neighborhood have small laminate...
  • Writing a Master's Thesis
    It's that time of year when my MSc students are starting to seriously worry about choosing a dissertation topic. With that in mind here ...
  • More of this (usually) means less of that
    Yesterday I sat in a meeting  in which student representatives  are invited to raise issues about their courses and departmental life in gen...
  • Drawing the right conclusions from the numbers
    Just commented on a British Politics and Policy at LSE blog piece by Luke Martell. He presents an argument against the marketisation of Bri...
  • The Waste Land
    From time to time I've tried to explain to colleagues  in other disciplines that sociology is a discipline of low disciplinarity. In ot...
  • Ephemeral factoids
    Another threat to scholarship: ephemeral factoids.  I was reading an article which cites a piece of information from the Office for Nat...

Caveat Emptor

The opinions expressed on this page are mine alone. Any similarities to the views of my employer are completely coincidental.

Monday, 3 June 2013

Searle on Foucault & Bourdieu

When the purveyors themselves (apparently) confess that their writing is deliberately obscure then one has to wonder a little about their intellectual integrity. Or is that just a vulgar anglo-saxon caricature demonstrating my lack of appreciation of obscurantism as a legitimate academic lifestyle choice? Well, whatever, I'm with Searle on this one.
Posted by Colin at 02:29

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)