Popular Posts

  • Bauman, plagiarism, blah, blah
    Another week, another plagiarism scandal. THE is reporting that one of Britain's favourite blah blah sociologists Zygmunt Bauman has...
  • The Best Dennis Skinner quotes
    This , from Haze , is a bit of fun, though perhaps a bit parochial. Do listen to Tony Blair's impression of the Beast of Blosover: it...
  • Blah blah sociology
    Taking a look at the videos on the British Sociological Associations web site of  its last conference I found one nice thing - richly deser...
  • Sociology and Elites
    My contribution  to the comments on Graham Scambler's interesting piece in Discover Society finally made it past the moderator. You ca...
  • On metaphors - cultural and social capital again
    Recently, as you no doubt know,  I've been beating up on the use of the term "capital" in phrases like "cultural capital...
  • GBCS comment out
    My comment on the Great British Class Survey is now published in Sociology 's OnlineFirst section and I've taken the pre-publicat...
  • Payment by results
    How depressing that - if we can believe the Guardian - a substantial proportion of teachers are in favour of payment by results. It just p...
  • The Comedians
    The important things to be done this week disposed of I sat down last night and started to read Social Class in the 21st Centur y. I wish ...
  • Humour
    I was thinking the other day about the last time I read a book that made me laugh out loud (I should perhaps add the qualification that only...
  • Fly through 17th Century London
    This is really cool. Well worth a look.

Caveat Emptor

The opinions expressed on this page are mine alone. Any similarities to the views of my employer are completely coincidental.

Wednesday, 30 September 2009

Normal and non-normal science

As a coda to my last post about the stange world of sociology journal publishing I found this short paper by Lin Freeman illuminating: http://moreno.ss.uci.edu/87.pdf. It never occurred to me that acceptance rates in hard science journals would be so much higher than in the social sciences though his explanation makes perfect sense. I wonder how it would look if you included in the sample more paradigmatic disciplines like economics or (non social) psychology?
Posted by Colin at 02:56

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)