Check out the repost of a nice Andrew Gelman piece on the perils of the "single definitive study". I'm not entirely sure what he means by "happy talk", but it's very apt as a description of the sort of academic gushing that seems to be required by the "impact agenda". Nothing against publicity, BTW, but perhaps one should have something worth saying first. Anyway, a good excuse to listen to REM.
Friday assorted links
-
1. Liberalism and weaponized interdependence. 2. Is the AI shock like the
China shock? 3. Can AI agents be individuated? 4. Who is liked by GPT 5.5?
(fro...
1 hour ago


No comments:
Post a Comment