Check out the repost of a nice Andrew Gelman piece on the perils of the "single definitive study". I'm not entirely sure what he means by "happy talk", but it's very apt as a description of the sort of academic gushing that seems to be required by the "impact agenda". Nothing against publicity, BTW, but perhaps one should have something worth saying first. Anyway, a good excuse to listen to REM.
Posts
Europe’s Security Depends on a Clear Electrification Target
-
The politics around electrification are beginning to shift in Europe as
more people recognize its importance for economic competitiveness and
industrial ...
22 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment