I have been known in my wilder moments to advocate the shutting down of some sociology departments on the grounds that they are purveyors of tripe so injurious to mental health that their continued existence is a public health issue. However even I am shocked by the following alert from John Holmwood:
"Dear colleagues, fellow students and friends:
I
don’t know if you are aware of the looming redundancies in the
University of Salford, and the process for weeding out staff. People in
most schools and departments (including
sociology and politics) are having to reapply for their jobs
(Professors are not included in this procedure, but in a different one
whereby they are asked, among other things, to take a cut in salary).
It seems only few people know about the redundancy plan going on, or rather about the current phase, since there have already been previous waves of sackings in the last months and years, and a new phase is announced for next year. The Union has organised a petition calling on management to reconsider. The petition is quite weak and does not explain the process, which is very appalling, but still you might want to sign it (https://www.ucu.org.uk/nosalfordcuts), or perhaps take a more robust kind of action, e.g. through the national associations.
About the process: people are forced to re-apply to their jobs in competition with one another (and in some cases in competition with external candidates). In sociology and politics, for example, the reapplication process consists of
It seems only few people know about the redundancy plan going on, or rather about the current phase, since there have already been previous waves of sackings in the last months and years, and a new phase is announced for next year. The Union has organised a petition calling on management to reconsider. The petition is quite weak and does not explain the process, which is very appalling, but still you might want to sign it (https://www.ucu.org.uk/nosalfordcuts), or perhaps take a more robust kind of action, e.g. through the national associations.
About the process: people are forced to re-apply to their jobs in competition with one another (and in some cases in competition with external candidates). In sociology and politics, for example, the reapplication process consists of
·
a written
submission providing evidence that what people do meets a post
specification recently developed by the university (15% - deadline 31
May, when people are at the peak of marking!)
·
an oral presentation on
‘strategy’ prepared during one hour and presented in ten minutes (35%). All we know about this is: “The reference to ‘strategy’ in the context of the academic presentation has to do
with the approach adopted by the School and/or its directorates in view of achieving success as an academic and financial unit”
·
and a 'competency based interview' (50%). About this we have been told: <<
You will also be required to
participate in a competency based interview where you will be asked a
series of questions which you will need to answer giving detailed and
specific examples of relevant experience. It is intended
that the interview will last in the region of 45 minutes to 1 hour.
You will be asked questions relating to the following competency areas:
-
Communication
-
Team Working and Motivation
-
Decision Making
-
Driving for Results
-
Embracing Change
-
Knowledge and Experience
-
Acting Commercially
>>
NO COMMENT!
Presentation and interview will take place, it seems, around middle June. The members of the tribunal-panel are also unknown.
This will create a precedent – the managers who have taken over the university can do all this with total impunity, as this process is not a typical redundancy procedure (which for them is clearly not good enough), so through this procedure they need not agree almost anything with the unions and can make sure they scare people to death and definitely commodify and managerialised education."
I believe Salford is not the only UK University attempting this sort of thing. I have even heard from reliable sources that a university at the more reputable end of the spectrum is seriously trying to rewrite contracts to enable departments to summarily get rid of staff whose research interests do not please the tastes of the managerial/professorial cabals that run the place. I would have thought that that institution's recent experience of relations with dictatorial regimes would have taught it a lesson, but perhaps I'm too optimistic about the human capacity for learning.
Clearly if Salford goes ahead with these plans then it is no longer fit to be regarded as a serious university . Self-respecting academics should boycott it.
Posts
